Sarah gave me these little words of wisdom during a discussion where I was telling her how I was letting slow players, the speed of the table and other things get into my head and get me off my game. I guess while I was working on changing my bridge, my stance, my stroke, I forgot to work on the mental aspects of the game. I think I've been playing "better" cause I've been trying really hard to not let any type of negative thoughts in while I'm playing.
"Pool is such a mental game that you can't let anything negative in." Sarah Rousey
"While positive thinking doesn't always work, negative thinking, unfortunately, almost always does." Mind Gym
Everyone seems to always be looking for that little secret that will suddenly take them from good to great and they always seem to focus on technique or equipment. It's why there's a million forum threads on aiming (and it's always a heated argument), why people own dozens of cues (guilty), and why people continue to accumulate dozens and dozens of books and videos. They seem to always be looking to find that secret technique or that magic wand that suddenly going to transform them and their game. Nobody ever seems to look within. I'm starting to think that what separates the good from the great is the 6 inches between people's ears. I mean, seriously, how often do we work on all the physical skills of pool, or any sport for that matter, but never on the mental parts of the game?
"Ninety percent of the game is half mental" Yogi BerraI was once asked why I play in these Open tournaments when I absolutely have no chance of winning. Besides it being "fun", well it can be at times, it's a good way to work on a lot of the mental aspects of pool - one being the ability to perform under pressure.
"Competitive toughness is an acquired skill and not an inherited gift." Chris EverettI look at the NYC women pool players and I notice how many times they have gone to Vegas, competed in the national events, and come home with a prize of some sort. I've heard people say "well you're in NYC and with a huge population you're bound to have a lot of talent women playing there." While there's some truth to this I think it's more that pool's very much alive in NY and there's tons of competitive events for women to play in - The JPNEWT. The Tri-States. The Blaze. The Predator Tour. Weekly Open events at various pool rooms. Hell, even the Amsterdam League is hyper competitive! The women that are going to Vegas and bringing back the cash are the one's you'll see every week in some tournament or another. I don't think it's so much that they are more talented than everyone else it's just that they are more mentally prepared. They been tested under fire and they're ready to win.
"Under pressure you can perform fifteen percent better or worse." Scott Hamilton
I recently wondered what do pro players do when they sit in the chair waiting for thier turn cause I never knew what to do. I too often let my mind wander and, in turn, lose my focus. Well, I found a new thing to do - I watch my opponents mannerisms. Having started to do this I can sometimes tell the moment when the players has "lost the match". I wait for the eventual bad roll or missed shot or any of the millions of things that can go wrong at the pool table and I wait for their reaction. I wait to see how they recover from it. Do they shake it off? Is it still bothering them? How long are they gonna let it keep bothering them? Are they starting to thinking negatively? If you watch closely you can tell, it's all in thier body language, and you'll know if they've already lost or not. (And, yeah, I was "that guy" not too long ago.)
I recently had a guy hill-3, race to 7. He came back and beat me. He never let being down bother him while I, on the other hand, just expected him to give up due to the lead I had. And as he started to inch closer and closer I started to play tight and I started to make very careless mistakes. I dropped my mental guard, he keep his up and he deservingly so won a tough match.
I just read Mind Gym, it's where I got most of the quotes above from, and while not breaking any new ground on sports psychology I still thought it was a good, simple to understand, very quick to read, and very thought provoking book. It causes one to do a lot of introspection and to realize that you are what you think of yourself more often than not. I guess it makes you pay attention to your thoughts more. In a match, for example, if you draw the #1 seed - what is your reaction? Oh no? Or oh yes! Have you already "lost" by thinking you can't beat the person before the match has happened? It's those types of thoughts I'm now more acutely aware of.
I haven't read Outliers yet but I have read about it's theory of 10,000 hours. I think it goes something like - to become a master at something you need to spend at least 10,000 hours performing it. While I do see it's point I think it should be ammended for something like sports - 10,000 hours will probably get you to the peak of your natural abilities. It will take you only as far as your talent will let you. I think I can spend 1,000,000 hours practicing basketball but I lack the physical skills, I'm slow and I've got a 1/2 inch vertical leap, to make it to the NBA. It doesn't mean I won't be good after playing so long but only as good as my talent allows me to be. I started to think about pool and all these people that are planning on going pro and I wonder how hard are they working at it. Are you anywhere close to the 10,000 hours? Has it been 10,000 quality hours? If so, are you at your ceiling? Are you as far as your talents going to take you? I see a lot of people in the pool room who have been playing for years and they are stuck at the same level. Is this why? Something to think about I guess.
I also, having read these two theories recently, been wondering how much of the mental game is talent? I mean would Mariano Rivera be who he is if it wasn't for the fact that he's such a clutch performer? There's a lot of guys who can throw just as hard as he can, who can pinpoint their pitches just as well as he can...only they can't seem to do it when the pressures on. I look at Derek Jeter - here's a guy who's good but not "great", numbers wise, but is gonna be remember for years to come for his clutch performances. A-Rod? He's the direct opposite. Arguable the greatest player in the history of baseball, numbers wise, but will forever be discussed for his inability to perform in the clutch.
Isn't that a little bit of what seperates the top pros in pool? They all can break and run out. They all have all the skills to win any tournament they enter yet it seems to always be the same names finishing high in these events. Do the "better" pros just perform better under pressure? Can you learn it or is it just part of what we call natural abiliity? How much of talent is mental ability? Something else to think about I guess.
Okay, it's getting late and, as you can tell, I'm rambling. I started this one a while ago and never got to finish it. It's still not finished but, eh, whatchagonnado.




